Object Storage vs Block Storage: what’s the difference and which is better?

01/02/23 Wavenet
Object Storage vs Block Storage: what’s the difference and which is better? placeholder thumbnail

When it comes to enterprise data management, the question of object storage vs block storage is one IT professionals and decision-makers face regularly. Whether you're modernising infrastructure, migrating to the cloud, or building data-intensive applications, understanding the difference between object storage vs block storage is essential.

In this blog, we’ll explore object storage vs block storage, compare use cases, performance metrics, and help you decide which storage solution is right for your business.

What is Block Storage?

In the discussion of object storage vs block storage, block storage represents the traditional method. It stores data in fixed-size blocks, each with a unique identifier, and requires a system to organise and retrieve these blocks.

Key benefits of block storage:

  • Low-latency, high-speed performance
  • Common in enterprise systems and databases
  • Ideal for structured data and fast I/O workloads

Use cases:

  • Databases (SQL, NoSQL)
  • Virtual Machines and boot volumes
  • Enterprise applications

What is Object Storage?

To understand object storage vs block storage, you need to see how object storage differs. It stores data as objects, each containing the data itself, metadata, and a globally unique identifier. Unlike block storage, it doesn’t use a file hierarchy, making it easier to scale.

Key benefits of object storage:

  • Virtually unlimited scalability
  • Rich metadata for better data management
  • Cost-effective for large volumes of unstructured data

Use cases:

  • Backups and archives
  • Media files (images, video, audio)
  • Data lakes and cloud-native applications

Object Storage vs Block Storage: head-to-head comparison

Feature Object Storage Block Storage
Structure Objects with metadata Fixed-size blocks
Performance Optimised for throughput Low-latency IOPS
Scalability Infinitely scalable Limited by hardware
Protocol HTTP/REST APIs iSCSI, Fibre Channel
Best For Unstructured data, backups Databases, VMs
Cost Cost-effective at scale Higher for performance

Object Storage vs Block Storage: which one should you use?

Still debating object storage vs block storage? Here’s a quick guide:

Choose Block Storage if you need:

  • High performance and low latency
  • Fast data retrieval (e.g., databases, apps)
  • SAN/NAS-like environments

Choose Object storage if you need:

  • Scalable, cost-efficient storage
  • To store large volumes of media or backups
  • Integration with cloud-native tools

Why Object Storage vs Block Storage matters in 2025

With the rise of hybrid cloud, edge computing, and big data, the object storage vs block storage debate is more relevant than ever. Object storage supports the growing demand for flexible, scalable solutions, while block storage continues to deliver unmatched performance for critical workloads.

Forward-thinking businesses often adopt a hybrid strategy, leveraging both storage types for different needs.

Conclusion: Object Storage vs Block Storage simplified

Understanding object storage vs block storage is vital for building modern IT infrastructures. If your business handles large, unstructured data sets or cloud workloads, object storage is the future. For high-speed processing and performance-sensitive apps, block storage is still king.

Need help choosing the right storage architecture?
Wavenet can guide you through the complexities of object storage vs block storage and tailor a solution that fits your business goals.

Talk to our storage experts →

Technology Services, Rubrik, Storage Solutions, Ebooks, Pure Storage, Cloudian

Latest blogs

See all posts
penetration testing
You’re probably right about your security gaps, here’s how to prove it

Have you carried out your penetration testing yet? Whether the answer is yes or no, it’s vital to ask whether you’re testing the right things - or simply making assumptions.

Read more
cyber security
What is VAPT? A complete guide to Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing

With cyber threats posing a serious risk to businesses of all sizes, attackers are constantly probing networks, applications, and systems for weaknesses - and unless organisations take proactive steps to identify and remediate those vulnerabilities, costly data breaches are increasingly likely.

Read more
Placeholder thumbnail
Business continuity software: from compliance tool to strategic advantage

For many organisations, business continuity software still sits in the category of “necessary but non-essential”, a line item justified by regulation or audit, rather than by value. Too often, it’s viewed as an insurance policy that rarely gets used and delivers little measurable return. That perception is understandable. But it’s also fundamentally flawed. After more than three decades working across business continuity, operational resilience, and crisis management, I’ve seen first-hand how organisations behave under pressure. I’ve also worked with a wide range of continuity platforms, some impressive, others far less so. What has become increasingly clear is this: when the right software is implemented well, it materially strengthens an organisation’s ability to withstand disruption. And the larger and more complex the organisation, the greater that advantage becomes. Clarity in the moments that matter most Disruption compresses time and amplifies uncertainty. In those moments, resilience is not about having a document on a shelf, it’s about having absolute clarity on what needs to happen next. When an incident unfolds, leaders and response teams must be able to answer critical questions immediately: What actions need to be taken, and in what order? Who needs to be informed, and what do they need to know? Which services are truly critical and must be prioritised? Where and how will those services be recovered? And if recovery isn’t possible, what is the agreed fallback? Most organisations already hold the answers to these questions, but they’re scattered across spreadsheets, documents, and systems, often owned by different teams and updated at different times. In a crisis, that fragmentation quickly becomes a liability. This is where business continuity software proves its value. At its best, business continuity software does far more than store plans. It helps organisations understand themselves. By capturing and structuring information on critical services, recovery objectives, and the dependencies that underpin them, these platforms provide visibility that simply isn’t achievable through manual approaches alone. Technology, suppliers, facilities, data, and key people can all be mapped in a way that shows not just what’s important, but why it’s important and what it depends on. This insight enables organisations to create clear, actionable response strategies, playbooks, and contact groups that can be relied upon under pressure. It also allows teams to challenge assumptions, identify single points of failure, and uncover hidden risks before an incident exposes them. Many modern platforms also support real-time dependency analysis and data-gap reporting. This makes it possible to visualise upstream and downstream impacts and quickly understand the consequences of disruption. Attempting this level of analysis using spreadsheets or disconnected documents is slow, inefficient, and highly prone to human error, particularly during an incident. A single source of truth, when you need it most Another often overlooked benefit of business continuity software is the ability to act as a central, trusted source of truth. When offices are inaccessible, internal systems are unavailable, or teams are working remotely, continuity information still needs to be accessible. Secure, off-site platforms, typically available via both web browser and mobile, ensure that plans, contacts, and response information remain available even when the organisation itself is under strain. In practice, this accessibility can be the difference between a coordinated response and a reactive scramble. How business continuity software supports resilience Increasingly, business continuity software is being used not just to support response, but to underpin broader operational resilience objectives. Platforms such as Shadow-Planner, for example, are designed to help organisations move beyond static documentation and treat resilience as a living capability. By bringing together critical service identification, dependency mapping, recovery planning, and crisis response within a single environment, such tools help organisations maintain a clear, current view of their operational risk landscape. Used effectively, business continuity software supports better decision-making, clearer accountability, and faster mobilisation during disruption. It reduces reliance on individual knowledge, simplifies complexity, and helps ensure that the right information is available to the right people at the right time. Key takeaways Business continuity software should not be viewed as a compliance artefact or an emergency-only tool. When implemented and maintained properly, it becomes a strategic enabler, one that reduces risk, strengthens preparedness, and supports confident, coordinated action when disruption occurs. In an environment where resilience is increasingly scrutinised by regulators, customers, and boards alike, the real value of these platforms lies not in the software itself, but in the organisational clarity they enable. The right business continuity software doesn’t just help organisations respond to incidents. It helps make them stronger. By embedding resilience into everyday operations, it improves visibility of critical services, keeps plans accurate and actionable, and supports better decision-making. Business continuity becomes part of how the organisation operates, not just something it turns to in a crisis. About the author Colin Jeffs MBCI transitioned into business continuity from IT project management, where resilience was a core requirement of system implementation. He has over 30 years’ experience in business continuity, operational resilience, and crisis management, holding senior leadership roles within major financial institutions in the City of London. Colin now leads Wavenet’s award-winning operational resilience consulting and software division and co-designed the latest version of Shadow-Planner.

Read more
Placeholder thumbnail
What is XDR? The benefits of managed XDR for cyber security

What does XDR stand for? XDR stands for Extended Detection and Response. It is an integrated cyber security approach designed to deliver comprehensive visibility across an organisation’s entire IT environment.

Read more
managed soc
What is a Managed SOC? Key benefits and how it protects your business

With cyber security threats evolving at an unprecedented pace - businesses face constant challenges in safeguarding their data and systems. Managed Security Operations Centres (SOCs) offer a solution to these challenges. They provide round-the-clock monitoring and management of security incidents. This service is crucial for businesses aiming to protect their assets.

Read more
colocation-services
Major business benefits of colocation: cost, efficiency, security & continuity

Managing servers and infrastructure can be costly and complex. Colocation services offer a strategic solution.

Read more

Stay service-savvy

Get all the latest news and insights straight to your inbox.